Genetically Modified Food

Both of these advertisements are about the concern of genetically modified food, but one is for it and one is against it.  Even though it seems like you would be for genetically mortified food or against it i happen to agree with the argument of both advertisement.  For example, the cartoon on page 1 makes the point that it doesn't matter that the food is genetically modified because it is necessary that it be this way in order to be grown somewhere with little water, and it is better for people that are starving to have food then nothing.  On the other hand, the advertisement on page 24 shows how you don't know what is in genetically modified food and the effects could be potentially harmful to you.  There is no arguing with either statement because each proves there point without being much room for alternative reason.  As the reader I can not argue that starving people should not be fed, but at the same time I don't think it is right for us not to know what kind of chemicals we are eating.  So, the authors prove their point in a way that is really unarguable.